Avian (IgY) anti-methanogen antibodies for reducing ruminal methane production: in vitro assessment of their effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) and production of methane, volatile fatty acids (VFA) and ammonia from an early lactation diet or from freeze-dried alfalfa were assessed in the presence of anti-methanogen antibody treatments in two in vitro ruminal incubations (experiments 1 and 2). In experiment 1, hens were immunised with crude cell preparations of Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanobrevibacter ruminantium or Methanosphaera stadtmanae and complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA). Semipurified egg antibodies (IgY) prepared from the hens’ eggs (a-SMICFA, a-RUMCFA, or a-STADCFA, respectively) were dispensed into 24 replicate vials (400 µL per vial) containing 500 mg of an early lactation total mixed ration (18% crude protein; 33% neutral detergent fibre; DM basis). Vials containing an equal volume of semipurified antibodies from eggs of non-immunised hens were included as a control. In experiment 2, hens were immunised with one of the three antigenic preparations combined with Montanide ISA 70 adjuvant. Triplicate vials per time point included 0.6 g of freeze-dried egg powder (a-SMIMon, a-RUMMon, a-STADMon; 19.0 ± 2.6 mg IgY/g) or a mixture of all three (ComboMon) and 500 mg of freeze-dried alfalfa. Total gas, methane production and pH were measured at intervals over 24 h. After 24 h, samples were analysed for VFA, ammonia and IVDMD. In experiment 1, cumulative CH4 production was similar (P > 0.05) among treatments at each sampling time. At 24 h, average CH4 production across treatments was 27.03 ± 0.205 mg/g DM. In experiment 2, a-SMIMon, a-STADMon and ComboMon reduced methane production at 12 h (P = 0.05) compared with the control, but by 24 h, CH4 levels in all treatments were similar (P > 0.05) to the control. At 24 h, total VFA concentrations were lower (P < 0.05) in a-RUMMon and a-SMIMon than in the control. The transient nature of the inhibition of methane production by the antibodies may have arisen from instability of the antibodies in ruminal fluid, or to the presence of non-culturable methanogens unaffected by the antibody activity that was administered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".