MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993098474 · doi:10.1115/icnmm2011-58183

Capacitance-Based Droplet Position Sensing Optimization Through Digital Microfluidic Parameters

2011· article· en· W1993098474 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel Angel Murran, Abbas S. Milani, Homayoun Najjaran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrofluidicsCapacitanceDigital microfluidicsPosition (finance)Materials scienceController (irrigation)AcousticsCapacitance probeElectrodeElectronic engineeringComputer scienceDielectricOptoelectronicsEngineeringNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design of a closed-loop droplet position control is an essential step towards the development of fully automated digital microfluidic devices. However, the performance of any closed-loop controller is ultimately limited by the accuracy and precision of the feedback sensors. In this paper, an effective capacitance based droplet sensor was designed and optimized through simulation to reduce the droplet position error. A full factorial design was conducted on the droplet sensor simulation model to observe the behavior of the position error as a function of the parameters of a digital microfluidic device. An empirical model was then fitted to the data obtained from the designed simulations and optimized to reduce the position estimate error. Results suggest that the performance of the capacitance based droplet sensor studied in this work is most dependent on the dielectric thickness, droplet radius, electrode pitch, electrode separation, filler fluid permittivity, and plate gap. Isoperformance curves of the sensor performance were obtained using the empirical model to show the interaction between digital microfluidic parameters, as well as to aid in the design of digital microfluidic devices equipped with a similar capacitance based droplet sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207