Intestinal permeability is increased in a proportion of spouses of patients with Crohn's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Increased small intestinal permeability has been found in patients with Crohn's disease and in a proportion of their healthy relatives. This may reflect a shared environment or shared genes. The finding of abnormal permeability in the healthy spouses of patients would favor an environmental cause for this observation. METHODS: The healthy spouses of patients with Crohn's disease attending three gastroenterology clinics were invited to participate. Eligible subjects consumed a 350-ml solution containing lactulose, mannitol, and sucrose before bedtime. All overnight urine was collected, assayed by high performance liquid chromatography, and the ratio of fractional excretion of lactulose to mannitol was calculated as an index of permeability. The results were compared with those of a previously determined control group. RESULTS: Sixty spouses completed the study. Increased permeability was present in eight (13.3%, 95% CI = 6.0-24.6%). The presence of increased permeability was not related to age, gender, duration of cohabitation, alcohol use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use or to disease activity in the patient with Crohn's disease. There was a nonsignificant trend for abnormal permeability to occur in those spouses cohabiting with the patient with Crohn's disease at the time of disease diagnosis (p = 0.128). CONCLUSIONS: Small intestinal permeability is increased in a proportion of healthy spouses of patients with Crohn's disease. The presence of abnormal permeability studies in patients with Crohn's disease and a proportion of their healthy close contacts suggests that this phenomenon is caused by environmental factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".