N-Gram Based Image Representation and Classification Using Perceptual Shape Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapid growth of visual data processing and analysis applications, such as content based image retrieval, augmented reality, automated inspection and defect detection, medical image understanding, and remote sensing has made the problem of developing accurate and efficient image representation and classification methods one of the key research areas. This research proposes new higher-level perceptual shape features for image representation which are based on Gestalt principles of human vision. The concept of n-gram is adapted from text analysis as a grouping mechanism for coding global shape content of an image. The proposed perceptual shape features are translation, rotation, and scale invariant. Local shape features and n-gram grouping scheme are integrated together to create new Perceptual Shape Vocabulary (PSV). Different image representations based on PSVs with and without n-gram scheme are applied to image classification task using Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. The experimental evaluation results indicate that n-gram-based perceptual shape features can efficiently represent global shape information of an image, and augment the accuracy of image representation by low-level image features such as SIFT descriptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".