MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993127397 · doi:10.1081/agb-200058361

Examples in Finite Gel'fand–Kirillov Dimension. II

2005· article· en· W1993127397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Algebra · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsKrull dimensionFinitely-generated abelian groupDimension (graph theory)Prime (order theory)Dimension theory (algebra)Global dimensionPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsNoetherian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT For any field F, we give an example of a prime finitely generated F-algebra of GK dimension 2 for which GK dimension is not finitely partitive. For each m ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3,…} ∪ {∞}, we give an example of a prime finitely generated F-algebra having GK dimension 2 which has classical Krull dimension m; the algebra of GK dimension 2 which has infinite classical Krull dimension has the additional property that it does not satisfy the ascending chain condition on prime ideals. This answers some questions of Bergman. Keywords: Finitely partitiveGK dimensionKrull dimensionMathematics Subject Classification: Primary 16P90Secondary 16P70 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I thank Lance W. Small and the referee for many helpful comments and suggestions. Notes #Communicated by J. Bell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it