MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993161457 · doi:10.1029/1999wr900310

Controls on the distribution of major ions in pore waters of a thick surficial aquitard

2000· article· en· W1993161457 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Jim Hendry, Leonard I. Wassenaar

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlkalinityGeologyWeatheringAquiferPore water pressureIonGroundwaterMineralogyGeochemistryEnvironmental chemistryChemistryGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transport and geochemical processes controlling the chemical and isotopic composition of pore waters in the upper 45 m of a thick, surficial, clay‐rich till (Battleford Formation) were studied. The upper 3 m of the till is oxidized and fractured. The remaining 77 m of the till (the aquitard) is nonfractured and unoxidized. Concentrations of total dissolved solids, SO 4 2− , Na + , Mg 2+ , and K + decrease with depth through the unoxidized zone to a depth of about 15 m below ground, below which the concentrations remain constant. A similar trend was observed for alkalinity; however, the decrease in concentration occurs over 20 m. In contrast to these ions, Ca 2+ concentrations increase with depth through the upper 20‐m unoxidized zone, below which the concentrations remain relatively constant. The distribution of dissolved ions shows the presence of two end‐members: elevated solute concentrations in the oxidized zone attributed to geochemical weathering that occurred since the start of the Holocene and connate Pleistocene‐age water at depths between 20 and 45 m. Abiotic and biotic geochemical reaction rates in the aquitard were shown to be extremely slow or not occurring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207