Gene expression for enzymes and transporters involved in regulating adenosine and inosine levels in rat forebrain neurons, astrocytes and C6 glioma cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In brain, levels of adenosine increase up to 100-fold during cerebral ischemia. Based on in vitro studies, both astrocytes and neurons contribute to this adenosine release. Neurons release adenosine per se whereas astrocytes release adenine nucleotides that are metabolized to adenosine extracellularly. In contrast, inosine is released from both cell types via a nucleoside transporter. C6 glioma cells, which are derived from astrocytes, release inosine but not adenosine. The present study investigated the relative expression of purine metabolizing enzymes and transporters in neurons, astrocytes and C6 glioma cells by real-time PCR analysis. In agreement with the extracellular formation of adenosine and intracellular formation of inosine by astrocytes, the present study showed high expression of ecto 5'-nucleotidase and AMP deaminase type 3 in astrocytes. The lack of adenosine release from C6 glioma cells was consistent with the absence of expression of the AMP-preferring cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase in these cells. The predominance of nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR) insensitive equilibrative nucleoside transport (ENT2) in all three cell types was consistent with the greater activity of this isoform in comparison to NBMPR-sensitive ENT1 in these rat cells. Thus, cell type differences in adenosine formation and release are primarily a function of differences in expression of purinergic enzymes and transporters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".