MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preventing sensitization with mycophenolate mofetil in a pediatric kidney recipient

2006· article· en· W1993200783 on OpenAlexaff
Hubert Wong, Robert LaBerge, Elizabeth Harvey, Guido Filler

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSensitizationMycophenolateKidney transplantationTransplantationMycophenolic acidPanel reactive antibodyKidneySurgeryImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensitization, as measured by panel reactive antibodies (PRAs), occurs as a result of previous organ transplantation, blood transfusions, or pregnancy. The high-PRA levels increase the risk of complications during transplantation and may result in long time duration for future transplants. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to decrease lymphocyte proliferation and antibody formation. We report the use of prophylactic MMF in preventing the formation of PRAs in a pediatric renal transplant recipient with multiple donor exposures. A four-yr-old girl received an unsuccessful living-related renal transplant in February 2003 and was subject to multiple blood transfusions in the perioperative period. MMF, 500 mg/m2/day in two divided doses, achieved suppression of PRAs to less than 20% and allowed successful renal transplantation within nine months. No side effects occurred. This approach may reduce the risk of sensitization in future potential organ donor recipients in similar situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207