MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993212494 · doi:10.1109/ias.2006.256608

Real-Time Implementation and Testing of a Wavelet-Controlled Dynamic Voltage Restorer

2006· article· en· W1993212494 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh, M.A. Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueConference record · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)VoltagePulse-width modulationComputer scienceTotal harmonic distortionInverterElectronic engineeringDiscrete wavelet transformControl theory (sociology)Wavelet transformEngineeringWaveletElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an experimental testing of a discrete wavelet transform (DWT)-controlled dynamic voltage restorer (DVR) system for power quality improvement. The proposed DWT-operated DVR system is designed to continuously detect, diagnose and respond to different transient disturbances that may affect the power quality. The input voltage to the proposed DVR system is adjusted by approximation signals to ensure transient-free inputs. Also, the output of the proposed DVR is obtained using a dc-ac inverter, whose switching signals are controlled by a detail signal. Both approximation and detail signals are obtained using DWT of the line voltage. An experimental setup for the proposed DWT-controlled DVR system is constructed, where the DWT is implemented using a dSPACE ds1102 digital signal processing board. Moreover, sinusoidal pulse-width modulation switching signals for the output-end dc-ac inverter are generated using the same DSP board. In this paper, the proposed DVR system is experimentally tested for transient voltage dip, steady-state under voltage and transient harmonic distortion cases. Test results for these cases show accurate, fast and effective DVR system responses. In all tested cases, the load voltage is maintained at its predefined nominal value during and post any abnormal conditions, which validate the proposed operating strategy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference recordSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207