MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993213026 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2012.2220462

A Low-Power Delta-Sigma Modulator Using a Charge-Pump Integrator

2012· article· en· W1993213026 on OpenAlex
Alireza Nilchi, D.A. Johns

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegratorDelta-sigma modulationCapacitorCMOSIntegrating ADCPhysicsCapacitive sensingSwitched capacitorPower (physics)Power consumptionElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringVoltageOptoelectronicsEngineeringĆuk converter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a low-power switched-capacitor integrator based on a capacitive charge-pump (CP) is presented, and its practical effects are discussed. The CP integrator is employed as the first stage of a ΔΣ ADC. The 0.13 μm CMOS prototype of the CP based ADC achieves the same performance as a conventional ADC while consuming 66% lower OTA power in the front-end integrator. The CP based modulator realizes 87.8 dB SNDR, 89.2 dB SNR and 90 dB DR over a 10 kHz bandwidth with 148 W power consumption. The conventional ADC has similar performance but dissipates 241 W. The energy required per conversion-step for the CP based ADC (0.369 pJ/step) is almost 40% lower than that of the conventional ADC (0.607 pJ/step).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it