MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993229720 · doi:10.1353/tech.0.0405

Vauban, architecte de la modernité? (review)

2010· article· fr· W1993229720 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Culture · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Power (physics)Action (physics)PoliticsService (business)HumanitiesArt historyArtLawPolitical scienceSociologyClassicsHistoryEconomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Vauban, architecte de la modernité? Janis Langins (bio) Vauban, architecte de la modernité? Edited by Thierry Martin and Michèle Virol. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, 2008. Pp. 301. €29. Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633–1707) is most often remembered as Louis XIV's great military engineer whose name was indissolubly linked with classical artillery fortifications and siegecraft, not only in France but throughout Europe and France's colonial possessions. His interests in fiscal reform and in the description and compilation of the economic and human resources of his country have attracted respectful but lesser interest from historians. This began to change with Michèle Virol's Vauban: De la gloire du roi au service de l'état (2003), based on many unpublished documents [End Page 240] now in the Archives Nationales of France. A more balanced view of Vauban's activity and accomplishments has emerged. The volume reviewed here is a continuation of this trend and is the result of a conference in Besançon in 2007. It is divided into two parts. The first consists of essays analyzing the efforts of pioneers attempting to rationalize state-building action by using the methodologies and results of the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century. European monarchs were attempting to centralize power and to coordinate resources to augment that power, while thinkers imbued with a modern scientific mentality were attempting to articulate the technical with political action. Vauban was not alone here, and there is some debate in the book as to what extent if any Vauban was influenced by William Petty, founder of "political arithmetic" and member of the Royal Society. Both were close to scientific societies, both were enamored of quantification, and both believed in the rationalization of politics and administration. But in spite of their similarities, there is no identity between Vauban and Petty in their interest in censuses, economics, and taxation. Vauban was a soldier who was carried forward by his bent for efficiency and quantification to move outward from the fortress to the country as whole. Like the governor of the fortress, the king was the manager of his realm for the benefit of his power and the wealth of his subjects. This required inventories and information that was organized in an easy and accessible form. In addition to the lead essays by the editors, the first part contains essays on Petty and his influence in France (Sabine Reungoat), on the development of various kinds of state "statistics" in Germany in the second half of the eighteenth century (Guillaume Garnier), on the technical rationality of engineers in Vauban's time (Hélène Vérin), and on Vauban's ideas on more equitable taxation (André Ferrer). The second part of the book includes six essays illustrating Vauban's quantitative and organizing thinking in the domain of architecture and space. With the aid of numerous examples, Christian Corvisier and Isabelle Warmo effectively debunk the perennial view among many historians that Vauban had three rigid "systems" of military architecture. On the contrary, he was always attentive to the specific nature of terrain, existing structures, and financial constraints of building. Philippe Bragard provides an overview of European fortifiers and argues that neither Vauban nor his great Dutch counterpart Menno van Coehoorn was a major innovator; rather, they were talented borrowers and modifiers of established traditions that had developed during the last half of the seventeenth century. André Charbonneau looks at the work of French military engineers in colonial fortifications in Canada. Spain's engineers in its Latin American colonies were also aware of the methods of fortification attributed to Vauban, and Francisco Muñoz Espejo and Benjamin Blaisot provide a look at Vauban's possible [End Page 241] influence in Latin America, more particularly at the fortress in San Juan de Ulúa in Mexico. Somewhat isolated here is the contribution of Marino Vigano on the work of Micheli du Crest on the fortifications of Geneva in the decades after Vauban's death. Concluding the collection are two interesting essays with new insights about Vauban's oeuvre. David Bitterling suggests that Vauban's idea of a neatly hexagonal France to be measured, arithmetized, and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it