MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1993229720 · doi:10.1353/tech.0.0405

Vauban, architecte de la modernité? (review)

2010· article· fr· W1993229720 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2010
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEuropean Political History Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésState (computer science)Power (physics)Action (physics)PoliticsService (business)HumanitiesArt historyArtLawPolitical scienceSociologyClassicsHistoryEconomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Vauban, architecte de la modernité? Janis Langins (bio) Vauban, architecte de la modernité? Edited by Thierry Martin and Michèle Virol. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, 2008. Pp. 301. €29. Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633–1707) is most often remembered as Louis XIV's great military engineer whose name was indissolubly linked with classical artillery fortifications and siegecraft, not only in France but throughout Europe and France's colonial possessions. His interests in fiscal reform and in the description and compilation of the economic and human resources of his country have attracted respectful but lesser interest from historians. This began to change with Michèle Virol's Vauban: De la gloire du roi au service de l'état (2003), based on many unpublished documents [End Page 240] now in the Archives Nationales of France. A more balanced view of Vauban's activity and accomplishments has emerged. The volume reviewed here is a continuation of this trend and is the result of a conference in Besançon in 2007. It is divided into two parts. The first consists of essays analyzing the efforts of pioneers attempting to rationalize state-building action by using the methodologies and results of the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century. European monarchs were attempting to centralize power and to coordinate resources to augment that power, while thinkers imbued with a modern scientific mentality were attempting to articulate the technical with political action. Vauban was not alone here, and there is some debate in the book as to what extent if any Vauban was influenced by William Petty, founder of "political arithmetic" and member of the Royal Society. Both were close to scientific societies, both were enamored of quantification, and both believed in the rationalization of politics and administration. But in spite of their similarities, there is no identity between Vauban and Petty in their interest in censuses, economics, and taxation. Vauban was a soldier who was carried forward by his bent for efficiency and quantification to move outward from the fortress to the country as whole. Like the governor of the fortress, the king was the manager of his realm for the benefit of his power and the wealth of his subjects. This required inventories and information that was organized in an easy and accessible form. In addition to the lead essays by the editors, the first part contains essays on Petty and his influence in France (Sabine Reungoat), on the development of various kinds of state "statistics" in Germany in the second half of the eighteenth century (Guillaume Garnier), on the technical rationality of engineers in Vauban's time (Hélène Vérin), and on Vauban's ideas on more equitable taxation (André Ferrer). The second part of the book includes six essays illustrating Vauban's quantitative and organizing thinking in the domain of architecture and space. With the aid of numerous examples, Christian Corvisier and Isabelle Warmo effectively debunk the perennial view among many historians that Vauban had three rigid "systems" of military architecture. On the contrary, he was always attentive to the specific nature of terrain, existing structures, and financial constraints of building. Philippe Bragard provides an overview of European fortifiers and argues that neither Vauban nor his great Dutch counterpart Menno van Coehoorn was a major innovator; rather, they were talented borrowers and modifiers of established traditions that had developed during the last half of the seventeenth century. André Charbonneau looks at the work of French military engineers in colonial fortifications in Canada. Spain's engineers in its Latin American colonies were also aware of the methods of fortification attributed to Vauban, and Francisco Muñoz Espejo and Benjamin Blaisot provide a look at Vauban's possible [End Page 241] influence in Latin America, more particularly at the fortress in San Juan de Ulúa in Mexico. Somewhat isolated here is the contribution of Marino Vigano on the work of Micheli du Crest on the fortifications of Geneva in the decades after Vauban's death. Concluding the collection are two interesting essays with new insights about Vauban's oeuvre. David Bitterling suggests that Vauban's idea of a neatly hexagonal France to be measured, arithmetized, and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,864
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,004
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle