MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993238591 · doi:10.1144/sp390.1

The Bratten–Landegode gneiss complex: a fragment of Laurentian continental crust in the Uppermost Allochthon of the Scandinavian Caledonides

2013· article· en· W1993238591 on OpenAlexaff
Lars Eivind Augland, Arild Andresen, Fernando Corfú, Nana Yaw Agyei-Dwarko, А. Н. Ларионов

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllochthonGeologyGneissGeochemistryContinental crustCrustSeismologyMetamorphic rockNappeTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This report presents new field observations and geochronology (isotope-dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry/ID-TIMS and secondary-ion mass spectrometry/SIMS) on an igneous complex and its country rocks in the Bodø area, northern Norway, traditionally interpreted to represent the (par)autochthonous crust of Baltica ( c. 1.8 Ga). Field observations however indicate that the rocks are allochthonous and comprise the uppermost tectonostratigraphic level in the area. The presence of a migmatitic megacrystic granite with an emplacement age of 946 Ma strongly supports such an interpretation and indicates that the Bratten–Landegode gneiss complex is exotic with respect to Baltica. The 946 Ma granite intrudes metasedimentary rocks. The rocks were metamorphosed in the Late Ordovician and intruded by granitic pegmatites and diorites at 430 and 427 Ma, respectively. The Bratten–Landegode gneiss complex shows a close correlation with Mesoproterozoic–Neoproterozoic rock complexes in the East Greenland Caledonides and we interpret it to be a Laurentian pre-Caledonian continental fragment. The discovery of Laurentian pre-Caledonian continental crust in the Uppermost Allochthon calls for a revision of the tectonostratigraphy of this part of the Caledonides and provides important constraints on the sequence of events on the Laurentian margin prior to continent–continent collision between Baltica and Laurentia as well as on intercontinental interactions during the Caledonian orogeny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207