Natriuretic effect by exendin-4, but not the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin, is mediated via the GLP-1 receptor and preserved in obese type 2 diabetic mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activation of the glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) are new antidiabetic strategies. The GLP-1R and DPP-4 are also expressed in the renal proximal tubular brush border, where they may regulate Na(+) reabsorption. Exendin-4 (EX4) is a naturally occurring antidiabetic polypeptide (from the saliva of the lizard Heloderma suspectum) and GLP-1R agonist; however, part of its nonglucoregulatory effects are through GLP-1R-independent mechanisms. DPP-4 cleaves and inactivates GLP-1; thus the natriuretic effect of DPP-4 inhibition may be mediated by the GLP-1R. We report that parenteral application of EX4 in wild-type mice induced a diuresis and natriuresis associated with increases in glomerular filtration rate, fractional urinary fluid and Na(+) excretion, and renal membrane expression of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger NHE3 phosphorylated at S552 and S605, established consensus sites for cAMP-dependent PKA. These effects were absent in mice lacking the GLP-1R and independent of adenylyl cyclase 6. In comparison, parenteral application of the DPP-4 inhibitor alogliptin reduced plasma DPP-4 activity by 95% and induced a diuresis and natriuresis independent of the presence of the GLP-1R or changes in phosphorylated NHE3. The inhibitory effect on renal fluid and Na(+) reabsorption of EX4, but not alogliptin, was preserved in diabetic db/db mice and associated with a modest reduction in blood pressure. These results reveal mechanistic differences in how EX4 vs. DPP-4 inhibition induces diuresis and natriuresis under normal states, with preservation of GLP-1R-mediated, but not DPP-4 inhibitor-dependent, natriuretic mechanisms in a mouse model of obese type 2 diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".