MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993256513 · doi:10.2523/iptc-12015-ms

Concept of Classified Polymer Flooding Control Extent and Influences on Flooding Effect

2008· article· en· W1993256513 on OpenAlexaff
He Liu, Zhenbo Shao, Xiaoqin Zhang, Xia Li, Lijun Wu, Jing Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)InterconnectionPolymerPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringWater floodingPorous mediumPorosityMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologySoil scienceComputer scienceComposite materialChemistryTelecommunicationsMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In oil reservoirs, if sand bodies are interconnected, and the polymer molecules can penetrate, then we regard the porous volume as swept volume of polymer flooding. But polymer flooding effects are associated with interconnection types of swept porous volume, which has not been involved in the previous concept of polymer flooding control. Based on reservoir interconnection type, we've classified polymer flooding control degree into two types. And through numerical simulation, studies on relations between interconnection types and oil displacement effects have been conducted, the research results show that:As polymer flooding control degree of interconnection between sand channels increases, the final recovery rate of both water flooding and polymer flooding rises. The polymer flooding effects improve.As polymer flooding control degree of interconnection between sand channels increases, the recovery rate increments from polymer flooding rise gradually. When control degree is lower than 75%, the recovery rate increments are influenced by control degree significantly. When it's higher than 75%, the recovery rate increase slows down. So, in order to obtain better polymer flooding effects, polymer flooding control degree should be maintained at approximately 75%. 1. Necessity of focusing on polymer flooding control degree Reservoir geological conditions are important factors influencing polymer flooding effects. Traditional reservoir engineering description methods usually adopt permeability difference, vertical permeability variation coefficient and water flooding control degree to quantitatively represent reservoir geological conditions. However, when swept porous volume of water flooding is all 100%, the effects of polymer flooding vary. This indicates that the above-mentioned methods can not precisely describe the influence of reservoir geological conditions over polymer flooding effects. Since 'the tenth five year plan period', Daqing Oilfield has put forward the concept of 'polymer flooding control degree' based on polymer flooding of the secondary reservoirs (which refers to channel sand reservoirs, and non-channel sand reservoirs with effective thickness above 1 metre and effective permeability above 0.1µm2). A set of polymer flooding development technologies of combination of perforated zones, well pattern and flooding plan design optimization aiming to enhance polymer flooding control degree have been developed and perfected. But even so, with our further knowledge on polymer flooding in medium and low permeability reservoirs, we've found that the traditional methods can not satisfactorily reveal the influence of geological conditions on polymer flooding effects. So, it's necessary to deepen our knowledge of polymer flooding control degree. 2. Introduction of concept of classified polymer flooding control degree Practice of polymer flooding in Daqing Oilfield's secondary reservoirs show that, in the well groups with similar polymer flooding control degree, the dynamic variation of polymer flooding is significant (table 1, fig. 1). Analysis shows that there is fairly good correlation between polymer flooding effects and interconnection ratio of channel sand (fig. 2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207