MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993305638 · doi:10.1097/yic.0b013e328013f89d

Lamotrigine in the treatment of recurrent brief depression

2007· article· en· W1993305638 on OpenAlexaff
Lakshmi N. Ravindran, Arun Ravindran

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamotrigineVenlafaxineDepression (economics)Suicidal ideationAntidepressantAnticonvulsantPsychiatryBipolar disorderPsychologyMedicineReuptake inhibitorFluoxetinePsychotic depressionInternal medicineEpilepsyPoison controlPsychosisSuicide preventionLithium (medication)Serotonin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recurrent brief depression is a well-recognized subtype of depressive illness with brief episodes of depression alternating with periods of euthymia. The symptoms are often severe, with frequent association to suicidal ideation. Literature suggests frequent nonresponse to first-line antidepressants. Lamotrigine is an anticonvulsant with antidepressant properties, and reported effectiveness in bipolar depression. We report on two patients with recurrent brief depression, nonresponsive to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine, and who responded to therapeutic doses of lamotrigine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.428 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Clinical PsychopharmacologySame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207