On the most general boundary conditions for the Aharonov-Bohm scattering of a Dirac particle: helicity and Aharonov-Bohm symmetry conservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We show that the Hamiltonian H and the helicity operator Λ of a Dirac particle moving in two dimensions in the presence of an infinitely thin magnetic flux tube each admit a four-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions. Each extension is in one-to-one correspondence with the boundary conditions (BCs) to be satisfied by the eigenfunctions at the origin. Although the actions of these two operators commute before specification of BCs, to ensure helicity conservation it is not sufficient to take the same BCs for both operators. We show that, given certain relations between the parameters of the extensions, it is possible to write down the most general domain where both operators H and Λ are self-adjoint with helicity conservation and also Aharonov-Bohm symmetry (ϕ→ϕ + 1) preserved, where ϕ is the magnetic flux in natural units. The continuity of the dynamics is also obtained. Our results imply that neither helicity conservation nor Aharonov-Bohm symmetry by itself solves the problem of choosing the `physical' BCs for this system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".