MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993316950 · doi:10.1002/rcm.4003

Fragmentation reactions of some peptide b <sub>3</sub> ions: an energy‐resolved study

2009· article· en· W1993316950 on OpenAlexaff
Alex G. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFragmentation (computing)ChemistryIonIminiumPolyatomic ionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fragmentation reactions of b3 ions of nominal structure AAAoxa, YAAoxa, AYAoxa and AAYoxa have been studied as a function of collision energy, allowing the construction of breakdown graphs expressing in a qualitative way the energy dependence of the fragmentation reactions. The primary fragmentation reactions of the AAAoxa b3 ion involve formation of the a3* (a3-NH3) ion and the b2 ion, with the latter becoming the dominant product at higher internal energies. For both YAAoxa and AYAoxa b3 ions the pathway to a3* is relatively minor with formation of b2 the dominant primary fragmentation reaction. For the AAYoxa b3 ion, in addition to a3*, abundant formation of the tyrosine (Y) iminium ion is observed with only minor formation of the b2 ion. The results support and expand upon the detailed mechanism of fragmentation of b3 ions proposed by Cooper et al. (J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006; 17: 1654).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRapid Communications in Mass SpectrometrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207