Load Decomposition at Smart Meters Level Using Eigenloads Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deployment of the advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) in distribution systems provides an excellent opportunity for load monitoring applications. Load decomposition can be done at the smart meters level, providing a better understanding of the load behavior at near-real-time. In this paper, loads' current and voltage waveforms are processed offline to form a comprehensive library. This library consists of a set of measurements projected onto the eigenloads space. Eigenloads are basically the eigenvectors describing the load signatures space. Similar to human faces, every load has a distinct signature. Each load measurement is transformed into a photo and an efficient face recognition algorithm is applied to the set of photos. A list of all the online devices is always stored and can be accessed at any time. The proposed method can be implemented at the smart meters level. The distributed computation that can be achieved by performing simple calculations at each smart meter, without the need for sending intensive data to a central processor, is beneficial. From a system operator perspective, load composition in near-real-time provides the loads' voltage dependence that are needed, for example, in volt-VAR optimization (VVO) in distribution systems. Further applications of load composition data are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it