MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993359950 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.075128

Numerical study of anomalous refraction in photonic crystals

2005· article· en· W1993359950 on OpenAlexafffund
Suxia Yang, Tao Xu, Harry E. Ruda, M. L. Cowan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSlabPhotonic crystalOpticsBent molecular geometryNegative refractionAnisotropyUniaxial crystalPassbandRefractionPhysicsFinite-difference time-domain methodFourier transformOptical axisMaterials scienceMetamaterial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a theoretical study of light propagation through photonic crystal (PhC) structures using an effective medium approximation based on equifrequency surface calculations. The procedure is illustrated by calculating bending, splitting and focusing phenomena in a slab of two-dimensional PhC using a Fourier imaging technique. In the passband above the first stop band, wave propagation was found to depend dramatically on both light frequency and incident direction. This propagation anisotropy leads to very large negative refraction along the [11] crystal direction. Light emitted from a line source outside the PhC slab can be focused, divided into subbeams inside the PhC, bent negatively, and refocused again on the other side the slab. The results agree well with the field calculated using a finite-difference time-domain method and can be straightforwardly applied to more complicated PhC structures, such as three-dimensional PhC structures. The imaging properties of a PhC slab are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207