MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993365971 · doi:10.1002/ep.10431

A dynamic temperature model of mine water‐fed raceways used for microalgae biofuel production

2010· article· en· W1993365971 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Shang, John A. Scott, Gregory M. Ross, S.H. Shepherd

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Progress & Sustainable Energy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAlgal biology and biofuel production
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceFossil fuelRacewayBiofuelDewateringRange (aeronautics)Renewable energyEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementEcologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The mining industry is an extremely high consumer of energy, much of which is sourced from fossil fuels. The industry also generates outflows of “waste” energy in discharged gas, air, and water streams. Both the dependence on, and the environmental impacts of, fossil fuels could be reduced by on‐site energy recovery schemes that make use of both waste energy and the large tracts of the otherwise marginal or nonproductive land that mines sites create and occupy. One such possibility lies in the potential for on‐site use of the warm mine water from dewatering in raceways to support microalgae growth for biodiesel production. Mines are, however, often located in remote regions that can experience a significant range in seasonal ambient temperatures. In this article, a model that can be used to estimate the dynamic impact of a wide range of annual climatic conditions on the temperature of a specific volume of mine water flowing along a microalgae raceway is reported. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Progress & Sustainable EnergySame topicAlgal biology and biofuel productionFrench-language works237,207