A molecularmorphological approach solves taxonomic controversy in arctic<i>Draba</i>(Brassicaceae)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used a combined molecular and morphological approach to solve a long-term controversy in the taxonomically complex genus Draba L. (Brassicaceae): the delimitation of Draba lactea Adams versus Draba fladnizensis Wulfen. We also tested hypotheses on the origin of D. lactea, which has been reported as hexaploid and possibly derived from the diploids D. fladnizensis, Draba nivalis Liljeblad, and (or) Draba subcapitata Simmons. In an initial analysis of large population samples of three of these autogamous species, intrapopulational isozyme variation was low or absent (mean genotypic diversity, D, was 0.10), the diploids were almost invariably homozygous, and D. lactea was highly fixed-heterozygous. In the main analysis, we examined 3547 populations of the four tentative species from the arctic archipelago of Svalbard for variation in isozymes, random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), and 36 morphological characters. Multivariate analyses of the RAPD data revealed four very distinct groups of multilocus phenotypes. These groups also differed in several morphological characters and corresponded to the four tentative species. The species were less differentiated at isozyme loci, in particular the diploids D. fladnizensis and D. subcapitata, but D. lactea was clearly distinguished from D. fladnizensis based on all three data sets. Contrary to most earlier suggestions, the hexaploid D. lactea was genetically more similar to D. subcapitata than to D. nivalis, but our analyses of the material from Svalbard did not give conclusive evidence on the origin of this widespread arctic hexaploid.Key words: arctic, Draba, isozymes, morphology, polyploidy, RAPDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it