Chromatographically Distinguishable Heme Insertion Isoforms of Human Hemopexin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two spectroscopically distinct, non-interconverting forms of human hemopexin have been isolated by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and characterized spectroscopically. Form alpha (characterized by a bisignate Soret CD spectrum) and form beta (Soret CD characterized by a positive Cotton effect) exhibit different spectroscopic responses to addition of Zn2+ or Cu2+, yet both forms exhibit the same metal ion-induced decrease in Tm for the thermally induced release of the heme prosthetic group. Far UV-CD spectra indicate that the two isoforms possess essentially identical secondary structures, but their differential retention during metal ion affinity chromatography indicates slight differences in exposure of His residues on the protein surface. We propose that these observations result from the binding of heme in form beta with an orientation that differs from the crystallographically observed binding orientation for rabbit hemopexin by rotation of the heme prosthetic group by 180 degrees about the alpha-gamma meso-carbon axis and from interaction of metal ions at two separate binding sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".