« Il n’y a point de missions en France »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur une affaire judiciaire menée devant le parlement de Paris à compter de mars 1763, à la demande de deux anciens missionnaires en Acadie. Jacques Girard et Claude Manach se considèrent membres du Séminaire des Missions Étrangères de Paris (SMEP), mais à leur retour à Paris, après leur déportation de l’Acadie par les Britanniques, ils découvrent que ni eux ni leurs collègues affectés ailleurs dans le monde ne sont reconnus comme membres du séminaire. Leur appel conteste la constitution du SMEP, selon laquelle on justifie leur exclusion, et il interroge ainsi la relation entre les missions et la métropole après la guerre de Sept Ans. Cet article établit de nouveaux liens entre leur lutte pour la reconnaissance, l’évolution des idées sur l’État, la nation et l’empire en France, et le rôle des missions et des missionnaires dans le monde atlantique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".