MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993445431 · doi:10.1002/pbc.20332

Reduced intensity hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation across human leukocyte antigen barriers in a patient with congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia and monosomy 7

2005· review· en· W1993445431 on OpenAlexaff
MacGregor Steele, Johann Hitzler, John Doyle, Manuela Germeshausen, Conrad V. Fernandez, Kim Yuille, Yigal Dror

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePancytopeniaTransplantationHematopoietic stem cell transplantationStem cellAplastic anemiaSavior siblingImmunologyHaematopoiesisBone marrow failureOncologyBone marrowInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT) is a rare inherited bone marrow failure syndrome that has the potential to progress to pancytopenia and acute myeloid leukemia. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is presently the only curative treatment approach. We used a reduced intensity transplantation regimen in a CAMT patient with aplastic anemia and monosomy 7 who had no matched related donor. The patient had rapid and durable engraftment with minimal complications and is well 24 months post-transplantation. Thus, reduced intensity conditioning might be a feasible approach to stem-cell transplantation in patients with CAMT who do not have a related donor and who are at increased risk of toxicity from standard conditioning regimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207