MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993447289 · doi:10.2118/71680-ms

Development and Use of a Through-Tubing Aluminum Cement Basket

2001· article· en· W1993447289 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jorge Lam, J. R. Lee, Nicholas Hands, Robert W. Nelson, T. R. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)
FundersShell Canada
KeywordsCementSpark plugMaterials scienceSour gasPetroleum engineeringOil wellCorrosionDebrisComposite materialMetallurgyGeologyWaste managementNatural gasEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An ingenious and inexpensive removable through-tubing cement basket has been constructed for use in open or cased hole and highly corrosive environments. While the basket was designed specifically for use in deep sour gas wells with sulphur deposition problems, it can be used in any zonal isolation application. A conventional inflatable through-tubing bridge plug can be used in sour service, but its elastomeric components make the plug vulnerable in the presence of sulphur solvents and amine based corrosion inhibitors. The cement basket is constructed from 100% aluminum, which eliminates the problems associated with the elastomeric materials and assures complete removal with acid, thus leaving no debris in the well. In June 2000, the cement basket was successfully deployed in a deep, sour, horizontal gas well. The 54mm OD basket was run through the tapered 89/73mm OD tubing string before being expanded in the 127mm OD production liner and capped with 4 metres of calcium carbonate chips and 10 metres of cement to provide the pressure integrity. Once cemented, the basket became a plug providing well control for workover operations and a barrier preventing fluid and debris loss to the formation. Subsequently, the permanent packer was milled and retrieved, enabling a new packer and larger tubing to be installed. The aluminum basket with the carbonate and cement cap was successfully milled out using coiled tubing in less than three hours. A small quantity of acid was used to remove any debris from the cement basket and cement sheath from the liner wall. While the cement basket is a new development, it is deployed using conventional, field proven equipment. It is also simpler and offers the potential for cheaper solutions than a conventional expandable bridge plug. With the experience gained, the next challenge is to build a 42 mm O.D. plug to be set inside 178mm OD casing, which will be more universally applicable for wells in Western Canada and around the World.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207