MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Paul Crews’ “Accident on Mount McKinley”—A Commentary

2003· letter· en· W1993458235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George W. Rodway

Bibliographic record

VenueWilderness and Environmental Medicine · 2003
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMountAccident (philosophy)AeronauticsForensic engineeringHistoryEngineeringPhilosophyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mount McKinley Mount McKinley in Denali National Park and Preserve is the giant of the Alaska Range and the highest peak in North America at 6194 meters (20320 feet). It is also the highest mountain in the world in or near the polar regions, situated at nearly 64 degrees North Latitude, 390km from the Arctic Circle. Numerous accidents and tragedies have occurred on McKinley, still the mountain's official name though many now refer to it as Denali (an older Native American name for the mountain), since explorers first set foot on its slopes in June of 1903.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.011
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0460.056
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWilderness and Environmental MedicineSame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207