Muon spin rotation and relaxation study of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ba</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CoO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A positive muon spin rotation and relaxation $({\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}\text{SR})$ experiment on a single crystal of ${\text{Ba}}_{2}{\text{CoO}}_{4}$ indicates the existence of an antiferromagnetic (AF) transition occurring at ${T}_{N}\ensuremath{\approx}24\text{ }\text{K}$. Weak transverse field measurements show that the paramagnetic volume fraction of the sample decreases rapidly at the magnetic transition, indicating a bulk effect which cannot be due to the presence of impurities. Zero-field measurements reveal the presence of a magnetically ordered state below ${T}_{N}$ with at least three crystallographically inequivalent muon sites. The results are compared to recent magnetic susceptibility and neutron measurements. Of the two AF spin structures proposed to explain recent neutron experiments, the ${\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}\text{SR}$ results clearly exclude the one involving AF order along the $c$ axis while supporting that with AF order in the $ab$ plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".