MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993467147 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.233418

Inelastic resonant tunneling in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>molecular junctions

2007· article· lv· W1993467147 on OpenAlexaff
Nikolai Sergueev, Alexander A. Demkov, Hong Guo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum tunnellingPhysicsAb initioInelastic scatteringResonance (particle physics)Molecular vibrationCondensed matter physicsElectronAtomic physicsInelastic neutron scatteringInelastic electron tunneling spectroscopyScatteringMoleculeScanning tunneling spectroscopyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an ab initio theory of inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy along with the theoretical analysis of recent experiments on inelastic transport in molecular tunneling junctions involving ${\mathrm{C}}_{60}$ molecule. We present a self-consistent procedure for calculating electron charge density and tunneling current in the presence of the electron-phonon interaction. We find that electron tunneling is significantly influenced by several specific vibrational modes. Inelastic scattering suppresses resonance transmission peak and substantially redshifts the peak position. We investigate the microscopic origin of this behavior by calculating the relevant vibrational modes and resonance wave functions under nonequilibrium transport conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207