MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993485315 · doi:10.1080/00207540500270364

Operational level-based policies in production rate control of unreliable manufacturing systems with set-ups

2005· article· en· W1993485315 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Gharbi, Jean‐Pierre Kenné, Adnène Hajji

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Production Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Mathematical optimizationSet (abstract data type)Exponential distributionProduction (economics)Exponential functionSensitivity (control systems)Sequence (biology)Production controlComputer scienceFailure rateReliability engineeringControl (management)Control theory (sociology)EngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the control of the production rates and set-up actions of an unreliable multiple-machine, multiple-product manufacturing system. Each part type can be processed for a specified period on one of the involved machines. When switching the production from one type to another, each machine requires both set-up time and set-up cost. Our objective is to determine the production rates and a sequence of set-ups in order to minimize the total set-up and surplus cost. As an analytical or even a numerical solution of the problem is very difficult to find, a combined approach is presented. The proposed approach is based on stochastic optimal control theory, discrete event simulation, experimental design and response surface methodology. It is proved experimentally that an extended version of the Hedging Corridor Policy is more realistic and guarantees better performance for two study cases. The first consists of the unreliable one-machine case facing exponential failure and repair time distribution. The second, which is more complex and where the optimal control theory may not be easily used to obtain the optimal control policy, consists of five machines facing non-exponential failure and repair time distributions. To illustrate the contribution of the paper and the robustness of the obtained control policy, numerical examples and sensitivity analysis are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Production ResearchSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207