MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1993535337 · doi:10.1086/375716

Neutral Hydrogen Associated with NGC 7129

2003· article· en· W1993535337 on OpenAlexaff
H. E. Matthews, C. R. Purton, R. S. Roger, P. E. Dewdney, G. F. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsMolecular cloudStar formationContext (archaeology)AstronomyInterstellar mediumPhotodissociationLine (geometry)GalaxyStarsPhotochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observations of the environment of the star-forming region NGC 7129 obtained with an angular resolution of 1' in the 21 cm line of H I are described. Two features of the image are extensively discussed: (1) a ring of H I emission about 30' in extent and (2) a relatively dense concentration of H I with unusually wide line profiles positionally coincident with the B star BD +65°1638. The H I ring is consistent with photodissociation of H 2 by the interstellar UV radiation field at the surface of an extended molecular cloud in which both BD +65°1638 and NGC 7129 are situated. We further show that BD +65°1638 appears to be an unusual example of a "dissociating star" surrounded by an extensive region of photodissociated H 2 and accompanied by a small H II region. The derived spectral type (B2.5) and the absolute magnitude for BD +65°1638 further suggest that the latter is very close to the birthline. The very young stellar age implied by the parameters of the H I region, considerably less than 10 4 yr, is discussed, and the properties of the H I region are compared with those of the prototype for this rare class of objects. We discuss both aspects within the context of star formation in NGC 7129.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→