MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993575968 · doi:10.1179/174313209x393573

Quetiapine regulates neurogenesis in ischemic mice by inhibiting NF-<i>κ</i>B p65/p50 expression

2009· article· en· W1993575968 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoying Bi, Bin Yan, Shaokuan Fang, Yi Yang, Jue He, Xinmin Li, Jiming Kong

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurological Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurogenesisP50NF-κBNeuroscienceMedicinePharmacologyCell biologyPsychologyBiologyTranscription factorSignal transductionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Previously, we showed that quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug, significantly attenuated neurodegeneration induced by global cerebral ischemia (GCI). The present work investigates the effects of quetiapine on neurogenesis. METHODS: Mice were treated with quetiapine (10 or 20 mg/kg/day; intraperitoneal injection) for 2 weeks and then subjected to GCI on day 15. Seven days after GCI, the mice were killed. Neuronal injury and neurogenesis were analysed using hematoxylin-eosin and 5-bromo-20-deoxyuridine stainings. Levels of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) p65/p50 expressions were determined by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: Global cerebral ischemia resulted in neuronal injury, neurogenesis and NF-kappaB p65/p50 expressions in hippocampus, especially in the dentate gyrus. Pre-administration of quetiapine significantly alleviated neuronal injury, while inhibiting neurogenesis and down-regulating NF-kappaB p65/p50 expression. DISCUSSION: NF-kappaB plays a key role in regulating neuron damage and neurogenesis. This work suggests that down-regulation of NF-kappaB expression may be one of the mechanisms by which quetiapine inhibits neurogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurological ResearchSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207