MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993581498 · doi:10.1364/oe.22.009659

Adiabatically widened silicon microrings for improved variation tolerance

2014· article· en· W1993581498 on OpenAlexafffund
Jared C. Mikkelsen, Wesley D. Sacher, Joyce K. S. Poon

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsWaferSilicon on insulatorMaterials scienceOpticsLithographyWavelengthSiliconResonance (particle physics)OptoelectronicsPhotolithographyElectron-beam lithographyWafer bondingResistNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that silicon microrings with adiabatically widened bends are more tolerant to dimensional variations than conventional microring designs with uniform waveguide widths. Through wafer-scale measurements of test structures fabricated in the IMEC Standard Passives process (193 nm DUV lithography, 200 mm SOI wafer), improvements in the intra-die and wafer-scale variation of the resonance wavelength are demonstrated. A 2.1× reduction in the standard deviation of the resonance wavelength across the wafer was observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207