MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993669247 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2013.6567782

Evaluation of compressed sensing in seismocardiogram (SCG) systems

2013· article· en· W1993669247 on OpenAlexafffund
Zexi Yu, Francis M. Bui, Paul Babyn, Anh Dinh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersRoyal University Hospital Foundation
KeywordsCompressed sensingBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceSignal processingAccelerationNyquist–Shannon sampling theoremSIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringReal-time computingBiomedical engineeringAlgorithmTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The seismocardiogram (SCG) measures the acceleration generated by the mechanical contraction and relaxation activities of the heart. It has been demonstrated to facilitate accurate identification of various coronary artery diseases. However, applications involving SCG are severely hampered by the large amount of data to be processed, preventing real-time monitoring and detection of diseases. This challenge is exacerbated in the case of tri-axial SCG, with the increase in data collected. Addressing this challenge, compressed sensing (CS) is a promising technique to potentially capture and represent signals significantly below the Nyquist rate. To this end, this work explores the possibility of using CS with SCG systems, by proposing suitable signal processing algorithms, and evaluating these methods with experimental data. The obtained results demonstrate significant reduction in bandwidth, while maintaining accurate signal recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207