MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oral trofosfamide and etoposide in pediatric patients with glioblastoma multiforme

2000· article· en· W1993693471 on OpenAlexaff
Johannes Wolff, Gabriele M�lenkamp, Silke Westphal, Thorsten Pietsch, Astrid Gnekow, Rolf‐Dieter Kortmann, Joachim Kuehl

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtoposideSurgeryChemotherapyRadiation therapyBiopsyProgressive diseaseInternal medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme in childhood is rare, and the prognosis for patients with the disease is poor. The Pediatric Oncology Society of the Germanic language group (GPOH) enrolls patients in a series of pilot trials, the first of which is reported here (HIT-GBM-A). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with glioblastoma multiforme, World Health Organization Grade 4, between the ages of 3-15 years (45% male) were enrolled during the period 1995-1997. There were 13 supratentorial tumors, 8 brainstem tumors, and 1 cerebellar tumor. The patients underwent the following procedures: stereotactic biopsy (n = 3 patients), open biopsy (n = 1 patient), partial resection (n = 6 patients), subtotal resection (n = 4 patients), and macroscopic total resection (n = 8 patients). Adjuvant treatment consisted of oral chemotherapy with trofosfamide, 100 mg/m(2), and etoposide, 25 mg/m(2), daily or for 21-day cycles interrupted by 1-week rests. Standard fractionated radiation (54 grays) was started concurrently with the first cycle. RESULTS: The chemotherapy was well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths and only minor side effects. The responses in 12 evaluable patients after two cycles were as follows: 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 3 patients with stable disease, and 7 patients with progressive disease. The median overall survival was 12 months. The 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year overall survival rates were 52%, 26%, and 22%, respectively, and the event free survival rates were 26%, 22%, and 4%, respectively. None of the four surviving patients (3.2 years, 3.4 years, 4.0 years, and 4.2 years after diagnosis) is event free. Two patients are alive after tumor progression: One patient was diagnosed with a medulloblastoma, and one patient was diagnosed with an osteosarcoma as second malignancies. A control group extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data had lower survival rates: the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: This chemotherapy will not be used in a randomized trial of patients with glioblastoma; however, it may be evaluated for patients with tumors that have more chemoresponsive histologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207