MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993707732 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5627732

Epileptic seizure onset detection prior to clinical manifestation

2010· article· en· W1993707732 on OpenAlexafffund
Muhammad Tariqus Salam, Mohamad Sawan, Dang Khoa Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Notre-DamePolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEpilepsyDetectorEpileptic seizureCMOSComputer scienceMATLABElectronic circuitPower consumptionElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringPsychologyNeuroscienceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the design of an epilepticseizure detector. This circuit is part of an implantable device used to continuously record intracerebral electroencephalographic signals through subdural and depth electrodes. The implemented seizure detector is based on a detection algorithm validated in Matlab tools and the circuits were implemented using CMOS 0.18-microm process. The proposed system was tested using intracerebral EEG recordings from two patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Four seizures were assessed by the proposed CMOS building blocks and the required delays to detect these seizures were 3, 8, 11, and 11 sec, respectively after electric onset. The simulated total power consumption of the detector was 6.71 microW. Together, these preliminary results indicate the possibility of building implantable ultra-low power seizure-detection devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207