MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993729344 · doi:10.1177/0142723703023001001

The Development of Communicative Gestures in Japanese Infants

2003· article· en· W1993729344 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFirst Language · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHearing Impairment and Communication
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGesturePsychologyCommunicationObject (grammar)EmotiveAgency (philosophy)LinguisticsDevelopmental psychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twelve Japanese infant-mother dyads were video-recorded at home in naturalistic interaction approximately every two weeks at varying ages between 9 and 14 months. Changes in their gestural repertoire that were similar to other groups studied previously were: an increase over sessions in Comment gestures, namely pointing but not showing, and a decrease in overall Request gestures, particularly reaching. Request gestures involving cognizance of agency increased, however. Increases in Object exchange gestures and decreases in Protest/Rejection and Emotive gestures found in previous studies were not replicated in this group. Agency gestures after 12 months were related to number of words understood, as reported on the JCDI. There was good agreement on the whole between gestures reported by mothers on the JCDI and the same gestures observed directly. These results provide some support for the universality of key gestural changes considered important for language acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it