MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993736390 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.04.038

The TRAF6 RING finger domain mediates physical interaction with Ubc13

2004· article· en· W1993736390 on OpenAlexaff
Jill Wooff, Landon Pastushok, Michelle Hanna, Yu Fu, Wei Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRing fingerRING finger domainUbiquitin ligaseRing (chemistry)UbiquitinUbiquitin-conjugating enzymeDomain (mathematical analysis)Zinc fingerChemistryBiochemistryTranscription factorOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6) is an important signaling molecule involved in a diverse array of physiological processes. It has been proposed that TRAF6, a RING finger-containing protein, acts as a ubiquitin ligase (E3) and a target for Lys-63 linked polyubiquitination mediated by Ubc13-Uev, a ubiquitin conjugating (E2) complex. However, the physical interaction between TRAF6 and this E2 complex has not been reported. We used the yeast two-hybrid assay to demonstrate that TRAF6 indeed interacts with the E2 complex through its direct binding to Ubc13. Either a single Cys-to-Ser substitution within the TRAF6 RING finger domain or an amino acid substitution on the Ubc13 surface, that is predicted to interact with RING finger proteins, is able to abolish the interaction. In addition, we found that TRAF6 can interact with itself and this self-interaction domain is mapped to the N-terminus containing the RING finger motif. Based on this study and our previous Ubc13-Uev structural analysis, the interface of Ubc13-TRAF6 RING finger can be predicted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207