MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lâminas de irrigação para produção de batata-semente em plântulas propagadas in vitro

2002· article· pt· W1993739166 on OpenAlex
Angela P. Nogales, René Chipana Rivera, Sérgio Nascimento Duarte

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental · 2002
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGrowth and nutrition in plants
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorticultureChemistryAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avaliaram-se, neste trabalho, três lâminas de irrigação (75, 100 e 125% da ETc, correspondentes aos tratamentos T1, T2 e T3, respectivamente) para produção de semente básica de batata (Solanum ssp) sob condições de estufa, a partir de plantas propagadas in vitro. O estudo se realizou na localidade de Viacha, próximo à cidade de La Paz, Bolívia. Os teores de água no solo foram elevados nos três tratamentos, mas se mantiveram com valores adequados para o desenvolvimento de plântulas de batata propagadas in vitro, sendo que o rendimento dos tubérculos não variou significativamente nos três tratamentos, alcançando-se 1,07, 1,03 e 0,92 kg m-2 para T3, T2 e T1, respectivamente. Por outro lado, houve diferenças significativas nas eficiências de uso da água, obtendo-se para T2, o maior índice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it