MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993749904 · doi:10.1080/09613210320000976

Adapting to climate change in Canada

2003· article· en· W1993749904 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nils Larsson

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Research & Information · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsInternational Institute for Sustainable Development
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsPolitical scienceClimate changeClimate change adaptationAdaptation (eye)GeographyWelfare economicsPsychologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The differences between mitigation and adaptation strategies are explained in terms of their environmental, institutional and political significance and linkages. The potential climate changes for Canada's different regions are presented and discussed for their overall and specific built environment impacts. Current national strategies and polices related to adaptation are still in a formative stage, but they recognize that responding to climate change requires actions not only to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but also to adapt to climate change. A national Framework for Adaptation is expected in 2003. Examples are provided of both the public and private sector efforts to consider adaptation to climate change at various scales. An overview of potential Canadian climate change trends and measures related to mitigation and adaptation is presented, with implications for establishing a research agenda for the built environment. Cet article explique les différences entre les stratégies de réduction et d'adaptation et ce qu'elles signifient pour l'environnement, les institutions et la politique ainsi que leurs relations. L'auteur présente et analyse les changements climatiques et leurs conséquences globales et spécifiques sur le cadre bâti au Canada. Les stratégies et les politiques canadiennes actuelles en matière d'adaptation en sont toujours à l'état de gestation mais il est admis que pour réagir aux changements climatiques il faut prendre des mesures afin de non seulement réduire les émissions de gaz à effet de serre mais aussi de s'adapter à ces changements. Un Cadre national d'adaptation est prévu pour 2003. L'auteur donne des exemples des travaux entrepris par le secteur public et le secteur privé pour étudier l'adaptation aux changements climatiques à diverses échelles. Il présente succinctement les tendances possibles en matière de changement climatique ainsi que les mesures de réduction et d'adaptation avant d'exposer les implications liées à la rédaction d'un programme de recherche sur le cadre bâti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuilding Research & InformationSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207