MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993761532 · doi:10.1109/tcad.2012.2198474

synASM: A High-Level Synthesis Framework With Support for Parallel and Timed Constructs

2012· article· en· W1993761532 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVHDLField-programmable gate arrayScheduling (production processes)ComputationAbstract state machinesParallel computingLookup tableProgramming languageEmbedded systemFinite-state machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a high-level synthesis framework called synASM that synthesizes abstract state machines (ASMs) to VHDL for field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). In particular, this paper focuses on the specification, scheduling, and synthesis of parallel and timed constructs. ASMs possess well-defined formal semantics for sequential and parallel computation, and their composition. We extend ASMs to support the specification of timing requirements, which we call timed constructs. We also describe the composition of timed constructs with sequential and parallel computation. A key contribution of this paper is the extension of the force-directed scheduling algorithm to support both parallel and timed constructs. We implement the synthesis back-end in synASM that targets FPGAs. Our experiments show improvements of up to 52% in lookup table usage and 34% in total area for certain examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it