An Experimental Study of Flow-Induced Vibration and the Associated Flow Perturbations in a Parallel Triangular Tube Array
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of an experimental investigation of the flow perturbations associated with tube vibrations along the interstitial flow path are presented. A parallel triangular tube array consisting of seven rows and six columns of aluminum tubes with a pitch ratio of 1.54 was studied. Measurements of the interstitial flow perturbations along the flow lane were recorded using a hot-wire anemometer while monitoring the tube vibration in the longitudinal and transverse directions. A single flexible tube located in the third row of a rigid array was instrumented with pressure transducers to monitor the surface pressure variations. The flow perturbation amplitude and phase with respect to the tube vibrations were obtained at a number of locations along the flow lane in the array. The effects of tube vibration amplitude and frequency, turbulence level, location of measurements, and mean gap velocity on the flow perturbation amplitude and relative phase were investigated. It is found that the flow perturbations are most pronounced at the point of flow separation from the tube and decay rapidly with distance from this point. It appears that the time delay between tube vibration and flow perturbation is associated with flow separation and vorticity generation from the vibrating tube.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".