MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993774310 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0560

Relationships between fungal endophytes and wood-rot fungi in wood of <i>Platanus acerifolia</i> in urban environments

2015· article· en· W1993774310 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carolina A. Robles, S. E. Lopez, Patricia D. McCargo, Cecilia C. Carmarán

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSecretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos AiresConsejo Nacional para Investigaciones Científicas y TecnológicasUniversidad de Buenos AiresConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsEndophyteBotanyBiologyPlant use of endophytic fungi in defenseMycologyWoody plantMycobiotaTaxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban forests, which are highly valuable for the urban environment, include trees from city streets that might be susceptible to wood-decay fungi. Fungal endophytes can colonize healthy plant tissues without causing external disease symptoms in standing trees. In this study, the diversity of endophytes isolated from wood of Platanus acerifolia (Aiton) Willd. from Buenos Aires, Argentina, is described and related to different levels of urban disturbance, tree age, and presence of wood-decay basidiomycetes. Samples were obtained from 28 asymptomatic trees (1643 wood core fragments) and 75 symptomatic trees (1516 wood sample fragments) from four sites with different levels of human disturbance. Fungal isolates were morphologically identified, and potential wood-decay isolates were phylogenetically analyzed. Twenty-seven endophytic taxa, including five basidiomycetes, were identified. The multivariate analysis suggested that the endophyte community of wood is highly influenced by the level of urban disturbance, followed by tree age and presence of potential pathogenic basidiomycetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207