MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993796027 · doi:10.3828/tpr.2012.14

Planning for Sustainable Asian Cities: The 11th APSA International Congress, Tokyo, 2011

2012· article· en· W1993796027 on OpenAlex
Zhu Qian

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTown Planning Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPolitical scienceCeremonyEconomic growthUrban planningOpening ceremonyMetropolitan areaPublic administrationSustainabilityGeographyEngineeringLawCivil engineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 11th International Congress of the Asian Planning Schools Association (APSA) held in Tokyo, Japan from 19 to 21 September 2011 brought together over 200 scholars and practitioners from Asian countries and beyond. During the Congress, 177 papers were presented in several dozens of sessions and 16 posters were exhibited. In addition to the participants from Asian countries, delegates also came from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, Turkey, the US, Israel, and Sweden. The Congress tackled the question of how to plan sustainable Asian cities through five different but interrelated themes: 'Inclusion, contestation and empowerment'; 'Managing and planning metropolitan change'; 'Environmental sustainability and resilience'; 'Transport, infrastructure and mobility; and 'Culture, conservation and tourism'. The Congress also highlighted planning and design issues in Asian cities through the organisation of two workshops: 'Planning education in Asian planning schools' and 'Contemporary community design and governance in Asian cities'. Finally, in response to Japan's recent Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in March 2011, the Congress organised a symposium on 'Disaster prevention and reconstruction after major natural and manmade disasters'. Opening ceremony and keynote speech In the opening ceremony, Professor Anthony Gar Oh Yeh (University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China) introduced the Asian Planning Schools Association and gave an address reflecting on its twenty-year experience. The 1st International Congress (formerly named the International Congress of City and Regional Planning Schools and Departments of Asian Universities) was organised by the Department of Urban Engineering at the University of Tokyo in November 1991. The 2nd International Congress of Asian Planning Schools held at the University of Hong Kong in 1993, and witnessed the establishment of the Asian Planning Schools Association. In Hong Kong, the participants agreed that a formal network for exchange and collaboration needed to be established to enhance planning education and research among Asian countries. Since then, the biennial APSA Congress has provided a platform for idea exchange about planning challenges and opportunities in Asian cities for academics, researchers and practitioners not only among Asian countries but from all over the world. Tadao Ando, an internationally renowned Japanese architect and Pritzker Architecture Prize winner, gave an informed keynote lecture titled 'Architecture in City'. Despite the fact that Ando did not have formal training in architecture, he has been highly recognised in both practice and education. By using his project practices in Japan, such as those in Tokyo and Osaka, as examples, Ando emphasised that the important thing is to increase the use of natural resources such as green infrastructure in planning and design. For Ando, the city should be made of citizens with pride. The city is made by sustainability and passion. He also commented on current architectural education in Japan. Conference sessions In an age of globalisation, the 11th APSA International Congress took up the task of reconsidering traditional urban planning concepts and instruments in Asian cities for future sustainable urban planning. The Congress provided a forum for reporting on the investigation of urban planning and research and for sharing professional and academic expertise. To this end, five main themes with 25 sub-themes were presented and discussed (see Table 1). Technical tour The Congress offered delegates an interesting technical tour exploring major development models of Tokyo: the Otemachi-Marunouchi-Yurakucho (OMY) district; the Tokyo Station restoration project; Tokyo Midtown; and Roppongi Hills. Situated in the heart of metropolitan Tokyo, the 120 ha. OMY district is a center of international business in Japan. The development and reinforcement of this district has played an essential role in helping Tokyo and even Japan itself continue its growth as one of the leaders in the global economy. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it