MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993801968 · doi:10.1353/utq.2005.0069

The Case against Johann Reuchlin: Religious and Social Controversy in Sixteenth-Century Germany (review)

2004· article· en· W1993801968 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Carol Piper Heming

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanismJudaismMeaning (existential)ClassicsHistoryReligious studiesSociologyLiteratureLawPhilosophyTheologyArtEpistemologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Case against Johann Reuchlin: Religious and Social Controversy in Sixteenth-Century Germany Carol Piper Heming (bio) Erika Rummel. The Case against Johann Reuchlin: Religious and Social Controversy in Sixteenth-Century Germany University of Toronto Press 2002. xvi, 174. $50.00 In a 1998 review essay, Erika Rummel applauded the number of recent 'works echoing the Renaissance humanist's call Ad fontes!' She concluded that 'by facilitating access to sources, the books provide a seedbed for future research.' Rummel's modest volume on the Reuchlin affair is just such a work. Rummel describes the Reuchlin case as 'an object lesson in cultural diversity,' one which 'opens a window on the degree of dissent present in sixteenth-century society.' She builds her case by identifying the three ways in which contemporaries of Reuchlin interpreted the affair, noting that 'protagonists agreed on the facts but not on their meaning.' First, she discusses the anti-Semitic overtones surrounding the debate between 'orthodox Christians' and so-called 'Judaizers.' The focus of this debate was the issue of Jewish books: should they all - except for the Old Testament - be destroyed because they are dangerous and blasphemous; or should they be preserved because 'none of the writings of the Jews has been rejected or condemned, either by secular or by ecclesiastical authorities'? Next, Rummel looks at the humanist-scholastic debate over the significance of the Jewish books as historical sources. As she points out, Reuchlin's own perception of the case was that it represented 'the latest in a long series of confrontations between humanists and theologians.' Within this context, some of the best-known polemical tracts concerning the affair were produced, including Letters of Famous Men and Letters of Obscure Men (translated excerpts of which are included in the document section of this book). Finally, Rummel notes that the participation of many humanists in the debate helped develop what she terms a 'third construct,' in which Reuchlin was linked to Luther, and in which the Reuchlin affair became, [End Page 400] most significantly, a 'pre-Reformation controversy.' Rummel devotes chapters to each of the three sixteenth-century interpretations of the affair; she then examines the degree to which each of these interpretations may have been spontaneous or consciously constructed. Her final chapter in the first section of the book is a brief overview of the modern historiographical take on Reuchlin. The second and longer section of the book is a collection of relevant documents that represent various sixteenth-century views of the event. Rummel includes works by Johann Pfefferkorn, Johann Reuchlin, Willibald Pirckheimer, Erasmus, Jacob Hoogstraten, Ulrich von Hutten, and Martin Luther, among others. She provides useful headnotes for each document, and, as she points out, 'many of the texts ... have been translated into English here for the first time.' In addition, her annotations, while perhaps elementary for the specialist, are numerous and detailed. Once again, her desire to help 'facilitate access to sources' is apparent. Particularly beneficial to upper-level undergraduates and beginning graduate students, The Case against Johann Reuchlin provides a challenging historiographical discussion as well as lucid translations of documents written by the various players in the drama. In her preface, Rummel laments 'the problem of writing about discourse without participating in it.' She expresses hope that her book will 'provide an antidote to the subjectivity inherent in any mediating narrative by supplying the texts on which the narrative is based.' She has done a commendable job of fulfilling this purpose. Carol Piper Heming Carol Piper Heming, Department of History, Central Missouri State University Copyright © 2005 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207