Focal adhesion proteins Zyxin and Vinculin are co-distributed at tubulobulbar complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tubulobulbar complexes (TBCs) are actin-related double-membrane invaginations formed at intercellular junctions in the seminiferous epithelium of mammalian testis. They occur at basal junction complexes between neighboring Sertoli cells and at apical junctions between Sertoli cells and spermatids. They are proposed to internalize intercellular junctions during the translocation of spermatocytes from basal to adluminal compartments of the seminiferous epithelium, and during sperm release from Sertoli cells. Although TBCs are specific to the seminiferous epithelium, they morphologically resemble podosomes in osteoclasts. Previously, we have reported that a key group of proteins consisting of N-WASp, Arp2/3, cortactin and dynamin that occur at podosomes also is present at TBCs. Here we explore the prediction that zyxin, a focal adhesion protein known to be present at podosomes, also is present at apical TBCs. A rabbit polyclonal anti-zyxin antibody (B71) was used to label fixed fragments and frozen sections of testis. In both fragments and sections, B71 labeled tubular regions of TBCs at apical sites of attachment between Sertoli cells and spermatids, in addition to being localized at actin related intercellular adhesion junctions termed ectoplasmic specializations. Although the function of zyxin at TBCs has yet to be determined, the protein is known to interact with the cytoplasmic domain of integrins at focal adhesions, and integrins are known to be present in TBCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".