Topical Mitomycin Treatment for Primary Acquired Melanosis of the Conjunctiva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A case of primary acquired melanosis of the conjunctiva primarily treated with topical mitomycin chemotherapy is presented. The patient underwent treatment with one 2-week course of topical mitomycin 0.02% four times daily, followed 4 weeks later by a 2-week course of topical mitomycin 0.04% four times daily, followed by a 3-month course of topical mitomycin 0.02% twice daily. Map biopsies were performed after the initial two courses of mitomycin therapy and 12 months after all courses of mitomycin treatment had been completed. Complete resolution of the conjunctival pigmentation was noted after the final course of treatment. Map biopsies performed at 12 months following completion of treatment showed normal conjunctiva histopathologically. No recurrence of pigmentation was noted in follow-up 26 months after completion of treatment. Topical mitomycin chemotherapy may be a successful primary treatment for primary acquired melanosis of the conjunctiva.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".