Perturbations des tourbières de la région de Bécancour, Centre-du-Québec, entre 1966 et 2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les tourbières abondent dans l’ensemble du Québec, mais celles de la vallée du Saint-Laurent subissent des pressions anthropiques majeures. Ces pressions et les pertes de superficies en tourbières qui en résultent sont à peu près inconnues. Nous avons mesuré la superficie occupée par les tourbières en 1966 et 2010 dans la région de Bécancour et identifié les perturbations récentes qu’elles ont subies à l’aide de la photo-interprétation et de validations sur le terrain. En 2010, les tourbières couvraient 17 500 ha, soit 6,1 % du territoire étudié. De cette superficie, 10 485 ha représentaient des tourbières encore intactes et 7 015 ha des tourbières ayant subi des perturbations limitées, notamment par la présence de canaux de drainage et de chemins forestiers. Entre 1966 et 2010, 5 433 ha de tourbières (près du quart des tourbières présentes en 1966) ont subi des perturbations irréversibles, principalement en raison de la culture de la canneberge (Vaccinium macrocarpon). Cette culture a connu un développement important au cours de la dernière décennie dans le Centre-du-Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".