Dopamine partial agonist actions of the glutamate receptor agonists LY 354,740 and LY 379,268
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because glutamate compounds alter the release of dopamine and prolactin, the present study examined whether group II metabotropic receptor agonists, LY 354,740 and LY 379,268, had any direct in vitro action on dopamine D2 receptors on rat striatal tissue, cloned D2Long receptors, and prolactin release from anterior pituitary cells. In competition versus the D2-specific ligand [(3)H]domperidone, LY 354,740 had a dissociation constant of 24 nM at D2(High) (the functional high-affinity state of dopamine D2 receptors), while the value for LY 379,268 was 21 nM. LY 354,740 also stimulated by 50% the incorporation of [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S at a concentration of 120 nM, but its maximal stimulation was only 22% of the maximum elicited by dopamine. LY 379,268 stimulated by 50% the incorporation of [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S at 280 nM, but its maximal stimulation was also only 22% of the maximum elicited by dopamine. However, both LY 354,740 and LY 379,268 potently inhibited the dopamine-induced incorporation of [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S with inhibitory Ki values of 43 nM and 30 nM, respectively. The release of prolactin from rat isolated anterior pituitary cells in culture was 50% inhibited by 20 nM LY 379,268 and by 100 nM LY 354,740. These Ki values are similar to those known for the mGluR II receptor, suggesting that these compounds may have both glutamate and dopamine actions in vivo. The dopamine agonist and antagonist actions of these compounds indicate that these drugs have properties of a dopamine partial agonist, and may, therefore, have antipsychotic action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".