New Bifurcation Critical Criterion of Flip‐Neimark‐Sacker Bifurcations for Two‐Parameterized Family of <i>n</i>‐Dimensional Discrete Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new bifurcation critical criterion of flip‐Neimark‐Sacker bifurcation is proposed for detecting or anticontrolling this type of codimension‐two bifurcation of discrete systems in a general sense. The criterion is built on the properties of coefficients of characteristic equations instead of the properties of eigenvalues of Jacobian matrix of nonlinear system, which is formulated using a set of simple equalities and inequalities consisting of the coefficients of characteristic polynomial equation. The inequality conditions enable us to easily pick off the fake parameter domain whereas the equality conditions are used to accurately locate the critical bifurcation point. In particular, after the bifurcation parameter piont is determined, the inequality conditions can be used to figure out the feasible region of other system parameters. Thus, the criterion is suitable for two‐parameterized family of n ‐dimensional discrete systems. As compared with the classical critical criterion (or definition) of flip‐Neimark‐Sacker bifurcation stated in terms of the properties of eigenvalues, the proposed criterion is preferable in anticontrolling or detecting the existence of flip‐Neimark‐Sacker bifurcation in high‐dimension nonlinear systems, due to its explicit parameter mechanism of the bifurcation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it